-- Summary --
Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Aftermath and Lessons Learned.
The underlying factors that caused the gas conflict of January 2009 continue to develop, as
indicated both by continued gas supply problems and by lack of progress towards a long-term
sustainable solution. Moreover, when confronted with the cold reality of political and economic
constraints, many of the optimistic initiatives floated during the crisis have begun to wither. Most
prominent of these is the Nabucco pipeline project, but both the revival of nuclear power and
regional interconnection to increase the robustness of the energy system have also had setbacks.
The dispute appears to have pushed the European Union to prepare better for future short-term
crisis management but the question remains whether Europe understands that not only short-term
crisis management but long-term solutions are needed, as well, among them meaningful
diversification of energy sources, suppliers and routes. See details on page 4.
Nabucco and South Stream: Are They for Real?
Despite the continued problems between Russia and Ukraine, the EU appears to be becoming ever
more hesitant about Nabucco. Meanwhile, Russia is signaling increasing commitment to South
Stream despite rising financial problems. This current period of Russian economic weakness may
be the best possible time for Europe to push forward with Nabucco. Some speculate that South
Stream is only a bluff to divert attention from the aforementioned pipeline. Yet, regardless of
whether South Stream is plausible, if Europe remains unwilling to support Nabucco strongly, it
needs to be clear about this and begin to discuss the shape of Europe's energy security system
without it. See details on page 9.
EDITORIAL: EUR 5 billion Stimulus Plan: Is It Really a Stimulus?
See details on page 2.
SHORT NEWS
See details on page 11.
WHAT TO WATCH?
See details on page 14.